Mensaje por Bateman » 17 Dic 2009 06:02
Acabo de leer esto y recordé el tema, de aquí venía mi confusión.
EL Barret M468 si lleva el sistema de enguarramiento de gases del M4

El REC7 también de Barret y en 6,8 SPC ya lleva el sistema "bueno", siento usar una terminología tan campechana

Pero si intento traducir esos terminos lo voy a liar más
Fuente:
http://americanrifleman.org/ArticlePage.aspx?id=1853&cid=2 "Interestingly,
the REC7 is Barrett’s second AR-pattern rifle chambered for this cartridge, with its first being the M468.
Although the 6.8 SPC-chambered M468 was well-received, the rifle employed the same direct gas-impingement system as the M4. The result was a system that jetted hot gases directly into the rifle’s receiver, leading to potential stoppages if regular maintenance and cleaning protocols were overlooked.
To enhance potential mechanical reliability, Barrett incorporated a short-stroke, piston-driven system that offers the potential for cleaner and cooler operation than one with direct gas-impingement."
Acabo de leer esto y recordé el tema, de aquí venía mi confusión.
EL Barret M468 si lleva el sistema de enguarramiento de gases del M4 :mrgreen: El REC7 también de Barret y en 6,8 SPC ya lleva el sistema "bueno", siento usar una terminología tan campechana :oops: Pero si intento traducir esos terminos lo voy a liar más :mrgreen:
Fuente:
[url]http://americanrifleman.org/ArticlePage.aspx?id=1853&cid=2[/url]
"Interestingly, [b]the REC7 is Barrett’s second AR-pattern rifle chambered for this cartridge, with its first being the M468[/b]. [b]Although the 6.8 SPC-chambered M468 was well-received, the rifle employed the same direct gas-impingement system as the M4[/b]. The result was a system that jetted hot gases directly into the rifle’s receiver, leading to potential stoppages if regular maintenance and cleaning protocols were overlooked.
[b]To enhance potential mechanical reliability, Barrett incorporated a short-stroke, piston-driven system that offers the potential for cleaner and cooler operation than one with direct gas-impingement.[/b]"